Cybersecurity Research & Resources

Thought leaders in information security, we conduct radical, world-changing research and deliver renowned presentations around the world.
Blogs | INSIGHTS | October 23, 2026

Below the Threshold: Why Britain’s Smallest Power Generators Face a Four-Year Cyber Security Gap

Key Takeaways A small-scale gas generator was taken offline for four days in July 2026. The UK Government confirmed the incident but has not formally attributed it. [1] Under the Network and Information Systems Regulations 2018, electricity generation is captured only at 2GW cumulative capacity, and the threshold expressly excludes generators that are not connected to a transmission system. [2] On 5 August 2026 the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero and Ofgem confirmed that baseline cyber resilience requirements for all Ofgem licensees will be built on…

IOActive
Blogs | INSIGHTS | October 20, 2026

Cyber Risk Management Strategies for Enterprises

“The most effective cyber risk management strategies prioritize business impact alongside technical risk.” – IOActive Security Team The strongest cyber risk management strategies begin with a business question. Which failures could stop a critical business service, harm people, cut revenue, or damage trust? A list of flaws cannot answer that question. Leaders need to see how weaknesses combine, which services they threaten, and what action will cut the risk. This framework focuses on five decisions: Link technical risk to business impact. Test real attack paths through offensive security assessments. Treat…

Christian Powills
Blogs | INSIGHTS | October 16, 2026

Signal Messenger Security: A Research Case Study

Signal Messenger is widely recognized for protecting private communications, but secure messaging depends on controls beyond encryption. This Signal Messenger security case study examines how IOActive tested Signal Desktop’s Windows screen-capture protection and what the results reveal about evaluating application controls against realistic attacker capabilities. Signal Messenger Security: At a glance ProblemSignal Desktop’s Windows content-protection feature prevents the application window from appearing in screenshots and screen recordings. However, the control relies on the assumption that only Signal’s own process will change the…

IOActive
Blogs | INSIGHTS | October 13, 2026

From 30 Systems to Over 100: What CISA’s Revised Water Sector Figures Reveal About the OT Detection Gap

Key Takeaways CISA has revised the scale of the July 2026 water sector campaign from the roughly 30 systems described by federal law enforcement at the time to more than 100 internet-exposed systems across at least 12 US states [1] [3]. The revised figure originated with CISA’s own observation, published on 21 August 2026 in exposure reduction guidance, rather than with incident reports submitted by the affected utilities [1] [3]. CISA has warned that the cellular modems involved may have been installed by operators, vendors or…

IOActive
Blogs | INSIGHTS | October 9, 2026

Secure Product Development Lifecycle Requirements

A final penetration test can miss a design choice that gives attackers an easy path later. An open debug port, a weak update process, or an unknown dependency can affect the whole product. For CISOs, CTOs, and product security leaders, secure product development lifecycle requirements define what to protect, which controls to build, how to test for vulnerabilities, and who owns each security decision. In practice, these requirements span six connected areas: security goals, threat modeling, hardware and firmware controls, component records, release checks, and postmarket response. Together, they answer…

Christian Powills
Blogs | INSIGHTS | October 6, 2026

Cyber Risk Management Strategies: Six Ways to Align Security With Business Priorities

Recent IOActive research on 2026 attack trends points to a recurring problem: attackers target systems that companies rely on the most, but watch the least, including operational technology (OT), firmware supply chains, and AI-enabled development. That raises a difficult question for security leaders: Which risks deserve investment first? The answer is not always the vulnerability with the highest technical severity. A useful cyber risk management strategy links technical risk to business impact, tests whether attack paths are realistic, and directs funding toward the risks most likely…

IOActive
Blogs | INSIGHTS | September 25, 2026

One Exposure, Many Actors: What the NCSC’s OT Alert Adds to the AA26-097A Picture

Key Takeaways On 27 August 2026, the NCSC published an Alert warning of increased targeting of operational technology (OT) systems across multiple sectors globally, including in the UK, carried out by a range of threat actors and resulting in some limited real-world disruption [1]. The Alert is deliberately unattributed. It should not be read as an extension of joint advisory AA26-097A, which attributes a separate and well-documented PLC exploitation campaign to Iranian-affiliated actors [2]. Three separate bodies of reporting published between April and August 2026, covering Iranian-affiliated PLC…

IOActive
Blogs | INSIGHTS | September 22, 2026

IT Risk Management Strategies: Key Metrics & Trends

Cyberattacks and data breaches have ranked as the number one global business concern for three consecutive years, according to Aon’s 2025 Global Risk Management Survey. The organizations still managing risk reactively are paying a measurable price. Hyperproof’s 2026 IT Risk and Compliance Benchmark Report found that 50% of those organizations suffered a breach in 2025. Among organizations with integrated, automated programs, the breach rate dropped to 27%. That 23-point gap reflects a strategic difference in program design: how often risk is assessed,…

IOActive
Blogs | INSIGHTS | September 17, 2026

Internet-Exposed OT: What the UK Generator Incident Tells CNI Operators About Attack Surface

Key Takeaways A small UK power generator was reportedly forced offline for four days in July 2026. Press reporting attributes the incident to Iran-linked actors, but the UK government has confirmed only that an incident occurred, declining to attribute it or identify the facility. The initial access vector has not been disclosed. Operators cannot map the incident to a specific product or vulnerability, and any vendor claiming otherwise is speculating. CISA’s Internet Exposure Reduction Guidance, revised on 21 August 2026, sets out four steps for identifying and removing unnecessary internet…

IOActive
Blogs | INSIGHTS | September 11, 2026

Worse Than First Reported: What CISA’s Revised Water Sector Numbers Mean for Every Utility

Key Takeaways CISA has confirmed that the July 2026 campaign against US water utilities targeted more than 100 internet-exposed systems across at least 12 states — over three times the roughly 30 Minnesota systems disclosed when the story first broke [2][4]. Georgia, Michigan, South Dakota and New Jersey have since confirmed their own incidents, including a precautionary boil-water advisory at a Georgia utility that was lifted after testing showed no water quality impact[5]. A second, separate joint advisory (AA26-231A), published August 19, describes threat actors using AI-generated…

IOActive

IOActive has a renowned history of uncovering security vulnerabilities in information technology platforms and devices. Our clients frequently ask our consultants to evaluate new products and technologies on their behalf. Our research teams regularly evaluate new devices and software. As a result, IOActive often discovers new bugs and vulnerabilities in third-party products, which can have a damaging impact on our clients’ security if the vulnerable vendors do not fix these issues in a timely manner. Learn more about our disclosure policy here.

Archive